| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][INET] move inet_sock into inet_opt and rename it to inet_sock |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:06:57 -0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41CE198B.7040005@conectiva.com.br> |
| Organization: | Conectiva S.A. |
| References: | <41CE198B.7040005@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
Em Sáb 25 Dez 2004 23:53, você escreveu: > Hi David, > > Now that 2.6.10 is out, please take a look if this is acceptable, > the following patches will deal with udp_sock, tcp_sock, etc. > > This is the start of the series of patches that will introduce > struct connection_sock, reducing the memory used by non connected > protocols, such as UDP. > > It is available at: > > bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 Dave, wait a while, I've just tried it with current BK, after Linus merged your 2.6.11 netdev queue and it breaks with things like Stephen's TCP ephemeral port changesets... - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFT] r8169 changes in 2.6.x, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: kmalloc packet slab, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH][INET] move inet_sock into inet_opt and rename it to inet_sock, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][INET] move inet_sock into inet_opt and rename it to inet_sock, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |