| To: | Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Lockup with 2.6.9-ac15 related to netconsole |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:22:18 +0100 |
| Cc: | Mark Broadbent <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041220211419.GC5974@waste.org> |
| References: | <59719.192.102.214.6.1103214002.squirrel@webmail.wetlettuce.com> <20041216211024.GK2767@waste.org> <34721.192.102.214.6.1103274614.squirrel@webmail.wetlettuce.com> <20041217215752.GP2767@waste.org> <20041217233524.GA11202@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <36901.192.102.214.6.1103535728.squirrel@webmail.wetlettuce.com> <20041220211419.GC5974@waste.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> : > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:42:08AM -0000, Mark Broadbent wrote: > > > > Exactly the same happens, I still get a 'NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP' > > with the r8169 device using the above patch on top of 2.6.10-rc3-bk10. > > Ok, that suggests a problem localized to netpoll itself. Do you have > spinlock debugging turned on by any chance? Any chance of: 1 dev_queue_xmit 2 dev->xmit_lock taken 3 interruption 4 printk 5 netconsole write 6 dev->xmit_lock again 7 lockup ? This is probably the silly question of the day. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix cls indev validation, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Lockup with 2.6.9-ac15 related to netconsole, Matt Mackall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Lockup with 2.6.9-ac15 related to netconsole, Matt Mackall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Lockup with 2.6.9-ac15 related to netconsole, Matt Mackall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |