| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] pktgen sleeping/timing rework |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:42:47 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <16830.58158.882590.971712@robur.slu.se> |
| References: | <20041210222058.GA5984@xi.wantstofly.org> <16830.58158.882590.971712@robur.slu.se> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:57:18PM +0100, Robert Olsson wrote: > Timing code gets cleaner and bit more predictable at least we know > better now how to arrange delay for lower rates. It still need some > experimentation. Sorting out the pps rate discrepancies for >10kpps was next on my list of things to do. I think fixing this is doable. > Appplied this to the development version and also renamed ipg to delay. > It breaks some scripts. We need a variant and of this and the FCS patch > for the kernel version. Is it sane to try and keep pktgen-2.6 up to date when the devel version is so much more flexible? cheers, Lennert |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: [PATCH] e1000 poll behavior, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] pktgen sleeping/timing rework, Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH,RFC] pktgen sleeping/timing rework, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH,RFC] pktgen sleeping/timing rework, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |