| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] sis900 printk and stack usage audit |
| From: | Daniele Venzano <webvenza@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Dec 2004 09:23:34 +0100 |
| Cc: | NetDev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <41BB4651.4040106@pobox.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, NetDev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20041208104721.GA31707@picchio.gall.it> <20041208110835.GE31707@picchio.gall.it> <41BB4651.4040106@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 02:11:13PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > This is a step backwards. > > You are _adding_ multiple copies of the same piece of code, just to > avoid calling a function. Ok, I'm learning what is good and what is bad. Patch dropped. -- ----------------------------- Daniele Venzano Web: http://teg.homeunix.org |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] sis900 printk and stack usage audit, Daniele Venzano |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] sis900 printk and stack usage audit, Daniele Venzano |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] sis900 printk and stack usage audit, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 5/5] sis900 printk and stack usage audit, Daniele Venzano |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |