| To: | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netdev ioctl & dev_base_lock : bad idea ? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:19:08 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1102630475.22746.7.camel@gaston> |
| References: | <1101458929.28048.9.camel@gaston> <20041208220642.6984519f.davem@davemloft.net> <1102573333.16495.2.camel@gaston> <20041208231331.40cd98ad.davem@davemloft.net> <1102630475.22746.7.camel@gaston> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:14:35 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also, why would we need the xmit lock when calling netif_wake_queue() ? > I'm not sure I get that one (but I'm not too familiar with the net core > neither). Hmmm, you're right, it seems it is not needed. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netdev ioctl & dev_base_lock : bad idea ?, Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000, Ray Lehtiniemi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netdev ioctl & dev_base_lock : bad idea ?, Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] port_reuse listen fix (allow simultaneous single listen + outgoing connects from same port), Ilya Pashkovsky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |