| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (rev 3) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:55:24 -0800 |
| Cc: | michael.vittrup.larsen@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041206094234.34861c78@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> |
| References: | <20041027092531.78fe438c@guest-251-240.pdx.osdl.net> <20041202135252.04e64f51.davem@davemloft.net> <41B14E57.5080803@osdl.org> <200412060918.04441.michael.vittrup.larsen@ericsson.com> <20041206094234.34861c78@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 09:42:34 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Third revision of the TCP port randomization patch. It randomizes > TCP ephemeral ports of incoming connections using variation of existing > sequence number hash. This one avoids the MD4 for the loopback case since > there is no reason to bother over loopback and it improves benchmark numbers. I don't think the loopback optimization is really necessary. And in any event, RTCF_LOCAL doesn't necessarily mean that the connection doesn't go "on the wire" especially when using Julian's "send to self" patch which I might add at some point. Anyways, please resend to me the version without the loopback hack and I'll add it to my 2.6.11 queue. Thanks Stephen and Michael. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netdev ioctl & dev_base_lock : bad idea ?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] port_reuse listen fix (allow simultaneous single listen + outgoing connects from same port), Ilya Pashkovsky |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (rev 3), Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomistion (rev 3), Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |