| To: | Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets |
| From: | Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:21:32 +0100 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bernd Eckenfels <ecki-news2004-05@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041207040235.GA10501@soohrt.org> |
| References: | <20041206224107.GA8529@soohrt.org> <E1CbSf8-00047p-00@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net> <20041207002012.GB30674@quickstop.soohrt.org> <1102387595.1088.48.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041207025456.GA525@soohrt.org> <1102389533.1089.51.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041207032438.GA7767@soohrt.org> <1102390241.1093.59.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041207040235.GA10501@soohrt.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
Karsten Desler <kdesler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * jamal wrote:
> > Beats me. Make sure it boots NAPI. Also if you can turn off ITR; intel
> > loves to turn on that silly feature.
>
> ITR was in fact activated. I think i've disabled it now
> (e1000.InterruptThrottleRate=0 in the kernel cmdline).
> And as I'm reading the e1000 code, there is no way to enable/disable
> NAPI without a recompile. So the fact that ethtool spat out -NAPI in
> the version string means that NAPI is actually used.
But looking and the int/s number, I'm not so sure anymore. Is there any
other way to find out?
# ethtool -i eth0|grep ^vers
version: 5.5.4-k2-NAPI
# ethtool -i eth1|grep ^vers
version: 5.5.4-k2-NAPI
CPU0 CPU1
169: 5 115554253 IO-APIC-level eth0
177: 78998347 5568 IO-APIC-level eth1
# sar -I 169 5 5
11:20:05 INTR intr/s
11:20:10 169 10401.40
11:20:15 169 10579.80
11:20:20 169 10965.20
11:20:25 169 10768.20
11:20:30 169 10460.60
Average: 169 10635.04
# sar -I 177 5 5
11:18:50 INTR intr/s
11:18:55 177 4769.74
11:19:00 177 4780.80
11:19:05 177 4669.74
11:19:10 177 4724.55
11:19:15 177 4748.50
Average: 177 4738.67
Cheers,
Karsten
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: status of via velocity in 2.6.9, Lenar LÃhmus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, P |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, Karsten Desler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: _High_ CPU usage while routing (mostly) small UDP packets, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |