| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc) |
| From: | Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:46:58 +1100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041129172210.687bcad3.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <20041129211855.GC17540@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041129172210.687bcad3.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hi Dave, > Try to reproduce without that patch installed. > > If there is any mixup of SKB handling by any element in the > path the packet travels, you're screw up all the TCP > accounting knobs on the socket and easily trigger messages > like the above. I'll try. FYI we have 70 gigabit cards in that machine, the reason send-to-self is so useful is that we only need one expensive machine. Without the patch we need to find two expensive machines with 35 gigabits in each :) Anton |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Paul Jakma |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Paul Jakma |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit), Manfred Spraul |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |