| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter |
| From: | Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:14:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041204005946.GA26654@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>; from romieu@fr.zoreil.com on Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:59:46AM +0100 |
| References: | <200412032325.iB3NPdG04693@xos037.xos.nl> <20041204005946.GA26654@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:59:46AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
> That + (2) + SMP suggests an irq routing issue due to a broken acpi
> table ("suggests").
IIRC ACPI is disabled in the BIOS (not sure), but I'm using a
RHEL3 2.4.21 kernel that does not support ACPI at all (due to
the RH patches rebuilding the kernel with ACPI enbabled does
not work anymore)!
> I would compile a (monolithic) recent 2.6.x to see its log and
> give a look at http://acpi.sourceforge.net/dsdt/index.php (once the
> ticket is opened at http://bugzilla.redhat.com of course :o) )
Well, I could do that, but the idea was to use this in a RHEL3
system, so ...
--
-- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] tcp: efficient port randomisation (revised), Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e1000 driver problem with Intel Pro/1000 MT adapter, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |