| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets? |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:55:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41ACB0C3.5020408@candelatech.com> |
| References: | <20041129222700.GA22918@xi.wantstofly.org> <20041129172540.6b959858.davem@davemloft.net> <20041130064823.GA27872@xi.wantstofly.org> <41ACB0C3.5020408@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:41:23AM -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > >Yeah, preamble (8 bytes), CRC (4 bytes), inter-packet gap (12 bytes). > > > >Perhaps the via-rhine simply can't send out packets back-to-back and > >needs 14 byte times of inter-packet gap. I couldn't find any stray +2 > >in the driver anywhere but I'm just checking. > > Couldn't you just sniff the resulting traffic to see if it is too big? Sorry, forgot to mention: I did check that, and the data portion of the packet doesn't appear to be too big. --L |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] [IPVS] add a sysctl variable to expire quiescent template, Wensong Zhang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |