| To: | Terry Griffin <terryg@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: odd behavior with r8169 and pcap |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:21:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1101772869.3382.101.camel@tux.hq.axian.com> |
| References: | <1101751909.2291.21.camel@tux.hq.axian.com> <20041129210213.GA3880@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1101766059.3382.57.camel@tux.hq.axian.com> <20041129231800.GB3880@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1101772869.3382.101.camel@tux.hq.axian.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Terry Griffin <terryg@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] > Passing acpi=off did the trick. Throughput is at the higher rate > with or without pcap monitoring. I did not have to change any BIOS > settings. As a longer term solution, something can surely be extracted from the acpi tables of your computer. See http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=122145%22%22 for an intro. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [BUG?] IP Compression over 2 interfaces, Joy Latten |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: KERNEL: assertion (!sk->sk_forward_alloc), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: odd behavior with r8169 and pcap, Terry Griffin |
| Next by Thread: | via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |