| To: | Marco Mellia <mellia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:50:28 +0100 |
| Cc: | Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, P@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jorge Manuel Finochietto <jorge.finochietto@xxxxxxxxx>, Giulio Galante <galante@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1101718412.14930.46.camel@verza.polito.it> |
| References: | <1101467291.24742.70.camel@mellia.lipar.polito.it> <41A73826.3000109@draigBrady.com> <1101483081.24742.174.camel@mellia.lipar.polito.it> <20041127092503.GA12592@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <1101718412.14930.46.camel@verza.polito.it> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:53:33AM +0100, Marco Mellia wrote: > Th's our intuition too. > Notice that we get the same results with 3com (broadcom based) gigabit > cards. > We are thinking of sending packet in "bursts" instead of single > transfers. The only problem is to let the NIC know that there are more > than a packet in a burst... Jamal implemented exactly this for e1000 already, he might be persuaded into posting his patch here. Jamal? :) --L |
| Previous by Date: | iptables, MANJUNATH |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Marco Mellia |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit, Marco Mellia |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |