| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: r8169.c |
| From: | Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:36:14 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041125205411.GA3204@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| References: | <20041119162920.GA26836@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041119201203.GA13522@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20041120003754.GA32133@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041120002946.GA18059@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20041122181307.GA3625@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041123144901.GA19005@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041123194740.GA32210@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20041125220233.GA23850@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041125205411.GA3204@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
It did *build* well enough not to blow up the kernel build with 2.95.4, it just failed in use... On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 09:54:11PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: > Dorn Hetzel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : > [...] > > I went ahead and remotely rebuilt using gcc 2.95.4 and upon reboot it > > worked long enough to ssh in and then it failed. So it sounds like the > > version of gcc DOES make a difference :) > > Ok, I'll have to audit the driver for the typical inline assembler + > arithmetic ops which 2.95.x dislikes. > > -- > Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ☆キャンペーン期間中！☆, mail2004_001@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPv6 and netlink, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: r8169.c, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | [patch 1/2] linux-2.6.7/net/8021q/vlan.c: add error check, janitor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |