| To: | Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][6/12][RFC/v1] Add IPoIB (IP-over-InfiniBand) driver |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:34:56 +0000 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <52sm71ex0l.fsf@topspin.com> |
| References: | <200411181046.6Dz1IPtDKfpgSXN9@topspin.com> <200411181046.Jj0jsF5E2KmiGN8f@topspin.com> <20041118200017.GA26976@infradead.org> <52sm71ex0l.fsf@topspin.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
> We can switch to dma_* (and in fact I see some reasons to do so). > However Greg KH suggested sticking with pci_* stuff until there's a > non-PCI device to deal with. That just means avoidable interface changes sooner or later. The dma_ interfaces also have the added benefit of allowing better control of the type of consistant allocation interface. Note that pathscale already has direct to HT infiniband components, but it's not sure whether they'll ever be supported by the OpenIB codebase. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][RFC/v1][11/12] Add InfiniBand Documentation files, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][6/12][RFC/v1] Add IPoIB (IP-over-InfiniBand) driver, Roland Dreier |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][6/12][RFC/v1] Add IPoIB (IP-over-InfiniBand) driver, Roland Dreier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][6/12][RFC/v1] Add IPoIB (IP-over-InfiniBand) driver, Roland Dreier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |