| To: | Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:25:30 -0800 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411201503510.6242@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411160931080.31882@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> <E1CUAQ2-0002jT-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20041116163106.3b62a39a.davem@davemloft.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411191755160.2567@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> <20041119223527.1f243d6e.davem@davemloft.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411201503510.6242@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:19:54 -0800 (PST) Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I tried to do this myself by identifying the tso related patches > that went in after 2.6.9 and just wanted to find out if i missed > any other patches that may have fixed the tso related assertions. At a minimum you missed the net/core/skbuff.c patch Herbert Xu made to fix missing of copying around tso bits when copying/cloning SKBs. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Paul Jakma |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Assertions when lowering tcp_tso_win_divisor, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6.10-rc2-netdev1 1/4] r8169: missing netif_poll_enable and irq ack, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |