| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp |
| From: | "Chad N. Tindel" <chad@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:04:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041109225812.GA6001@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <20041109205358.GA64015@calma.pair.com> <E1CRdBr-0001P2-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20041109224337.GB87321@calma.pair.com> <20041109225812.GA6001@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
> In 2.4 it is entirely possible to have a record broken up into two > reads. There is no guarantee that the two reads will be reading the > same record. Let me make sure I understand what you're saying here... You're saying that since pidentd is calling fgets(), that can actually result in multiple read() calls. Because of this, the first half of the line containing the address:port pairs can be with respect to one socket, and the second half containing the euid can be from another socket? Chad |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Wrong UIDs reported in /proc/net/tcp, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |