Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp

netdev

Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic)

To:	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic)
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:00:19 -0700
Cc:	dan.dickey@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0410291005100.3323@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com>
References:	<200410290925.48955.dan.dickey@savvis.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410291005100.3323@w-sridhar.beaverton.ibm.com>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This looks like the same TCP window overflow problem in 2.6.7 that came up a
> couple of days back.
> 
> See the thread
>       http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=109887532400001&r=1&w=2
> and the patch posted by davem.

Yes, and BTW for the original poster, BIC only effects sender
behavior whereas in your test case the Linux system with BIC
enabled is the receiver.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), Dan A. Dickey Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), Sridhar Samudrala Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), David S. Miller <= Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), Dan A. Dickey

Previous by Date:	Re: Asynchronous crypto layer., James Morris
Next by Date:	Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), Dan A. Dickey
Previous by Thread:	Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), Sridhar Samudrala
Next by Thread:	Re: TCP Hang (or close to it): Windows XP -> Linux (w/tcp_bic), Dan A. Dickey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]