[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_look

To: Brian.Haley@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:10:39 +0900 (JST)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <> <> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <417E92D9.1050305@xxxxxx> (at Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:09:29 -0400), 
Brian Haley <Brian.Haley@xxxxxx> says:

> > Second, because we're not ready to migrate.
> > Please do not do that (pushing it to the glibc people) until we're ready.
> > We really need to do in consistent way; kernel header / glibc header,
> > and even with other systems.
> The kernel struct is the correct size (since addr[0] has no size), 
> ip6_rthdr0 in ip6.h is not, it's 128 bits too big.  Let me know the 
> right steps to go through to correct this and I'll get it done, you can 
> send it off-line if you like.

Because we do not support RFC3542, extra 128bits is definitely correct.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>