| To: | Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg() |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:29:03 -0700 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410222004070.18616-100000@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <20041022.153137.99739029.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410222004070.18616-100000@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:07:01 -0400 (EDT) Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dave/Yoshifuji, > I agree that the case you pointed out is tricky. I am fine with either > EAFNOSUPPORT or EINVAL. But the POSIX and SUSv3 man pages specify EINVAL > as a error only when the sum of iov_len values overflows ssize_t. I now think EAFNOSUPPORT is fine. Please resend your patch to me under private cover so I can apply it Suresh, thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP crashes when cycling loopback interface., James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TCP crashes when cycling loopback interface., Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] address family not supported for sendmsg(), Suresh Krishnan |
| Next by Thread: | BUG: dst underflow (again), Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |