On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 12:25:35PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> The MARK bit-wise operations is also available for CONNMARK and could in
> theory be included in CONNMARK when submitted to the kernel
Yes, but doesn't the patch I just submitted to DaveM include all the
required functionality? both ipt_connmark and ipt_CONNMARK have a
'mask' parameter in ther {match,targ}info struct.
> I am fine either way.
If you think there's something (in the kernel) missing for bit-wise
operations of CONNMARK, please let me know and send a patch. Thanks.
> Regards
> Henrik
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|