netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Make netif_rx_ni preempt-safe

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make netif_rx_ni preempt-safe
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:58:40 -0700
Cc: vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx, irda-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, alain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041021003503.GA10391@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <1098230132.23628.28.camel@krustophenia.net> <200410202256.56636.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <1098303951.2268.8.camel@krustophenia.net> <200410202332.33583.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20041020171508.0e947d08.davem@davemloft.net> <20041021003503.GA10391@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:35:03 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 05:15:08PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> >  
> > +int netif_rx_ni(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > +       int err = netif_rx(skb);
> > +
> > +       preempt_disable();
> > +       if (softirq_pending(smp_processor_id()))
> > +               do_softirq();
> 
> You need to move the netif_rx call inside the disable as otherwise
> you might be checking the pending flag on the wrong CPU.

Good catch, I've made that fix in my tree.

Thanks.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>