| To: | Ravinandan Arakali <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: s2io: patch disposition |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:21:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxx, raghavendra.koushik@xxxxxxxx, rapuru.sriram@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <001e01c4b55e$c37aba50$9810100a@S2IOtech.com> |
| References: | <416E95AC.3010005@pobox.com> <001e01c4b55e$c37aba50$9810100a@S2IOtech.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Ravinandan Arakali <ravinandan.arakali@xxxxxxxx> : [...] > We'll resend the original 8 patches, followed by patch to address > your comments. Is it okay to send a single patch to address your > comments or you want that to be split as well ? Dumb question: is there something which prevents your patches to be sent with an MUA which inlines patches ? Or is there any hope for you to run some Perl crap on your computer ? :o) -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: s2io: patch disposition, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: s2io: patch disposition, Ravinandan Arakali |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: s2io: patch disposition, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | RE: s2io: patch disposition, Ravinandan Arakali |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |