| To: | Jan Killius <jkillius@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:39:18 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200410170940.28350.jkillius@arcor.de> |
| References: | <200410162004.17573.jkillius@arcor.de> <200410162323.01006.jkillius@arcor.de> <20041016214903.GC21849@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200410170940.28350.jkillius@arcor.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Jan Killius <jkillius@xxxxxxxx> : [scp test] > without TSO(1628MB 11.1MB/s 02:27): > 1 0 166388 27716 332 97264 0 0 12300 0 12323 7616 37 45 0 > 18 > 1 0 166388 26108 332 99804 0 0 12880 4 12727 7975 39 52 0 9 > 1 0 166388 24612 336 102796 0 0 12720 0 12590 7900 38 48 0 > 15 [...] > with TSO(1628MB 12.8MB/s 02:07): > 1 0 166340 27672 376 120056 0 0 13740 0 11879 2041 36 58 6 > 0 > 1 0 166340 25352 384 122288 0 0 13968 4 12148 2072 41 55 3 > 1 > 1 0 166340 22924 376 124692 0 0 14028 0 12174 2050 36 60 4 > 0 It could be done again now that M. Xu fixed the issue but the numbers seem consistent with the improvement I see here. TSO saves 5~8% of the cpu for this kind of setup. Thanks for the testing. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2.4.28-pre4-bk3] forcedeth: Gigabit ethernet support and media detection changes, Manfred Spraul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Yield in netlink_broadcast when congested, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure, Jan Killius |
| Next by Thread: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |