| To: | Jan Killius <jkillius@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:49:03 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200410162323.01006.jkillius@arcor.de> |
| References: | <200410162004.17573.jkillius@arcor.de> <20041016204848.GB21849@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200410162304.38905.jkillius@arcor.de> <200410162323.01006.jkillius@arcor.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Jan Killius <jkillius@xxxxxxxx> : > On Saturday 16 October 2004 23:04, Jan Killius wrote: > > > - what is the current transfer rate and is it better/worse w/o TSO ? > > > > I'm getting almost the same with both settings ~405Mbit/s. Roughly the same CPU usage ? > > > > > - which cpu/disk system are there within the (?) 128Mo box ? > > > > Athlon XP 1600+ the disk is a Maxtor 6Y060L0 gets with hdparm 42.76 MB/s > ups forget to say the ram size 512MB FSB333 DDR RAM I did not notice it first but the bi/bo columns of the vmstat output are mostly null. Assuming this is a single session ftp transfer, what ftp software does the r8169 based system run ? Pure curiosity: can you issue a test+vmstat with a blowfish scp to see if TSO makes a difference for your setup when the system is not disk-limited ? -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure, Jan Killius |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Yield in netlink_broadcast when congested, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure, Jan Killius |
| Next by Thread: | Re: r8169: page allocation failure, Jan Killius |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |