netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI)

To: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 21:07:46 -0700
Cc: Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4165864A.2010805@candelatech.com>
References: <41633174.7070805@candelatech.com> <16740.17875.574967.11417@robur.slu.se> <41646587.7070401@candelatech.com> <41649425.1010102@candelatech.com> <20041006180826.4a092c71.davem@davemloft.net> <4165864A.2010805@candelatech.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:09:14 -0700
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How does the existing (non pktgen) architecture work for VLAN devices
> and stopping/starting the queues in the underlying devices?

VLAN devices are simply virtual devices.  There is a real netdev
structure backing them, and thus you can point queueing disciplines
et al. to them just like any other device.

So that's the idea, somehow tie pktgen to use the existing netdev_wake_queue()
callback mechanism.  All I am really saying is that qdiscs may be a method by
which to do this.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>