| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:19:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jheffner@xxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041001125643.30c6830f.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <20040930213221.06a3f5b3.davem@davemloft.net> <20041001121123.19511403.ak@suse.de> <20041001124733.1ac4266a.davem@davemloft.net> <20041001195146.GA23046@wotan.suse.de> <20041001125643.30c6830f.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> As mentioned, the TCP receive buffer auto-tuning takes care > of all of this in 2.6.6 and later. It's just 2.6.5 doesn't How do you explain the 2-4MB/s less with manually increased receive buffers? -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] (3/3) tcp westwood cleanup for 2.4, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: generic 802.11 stack, Vladimir Kondratiev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state, John Heffner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Current 2.6.x TSO state, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |