OK, I'll send patches to netfilter-devel as ever.
Thanks,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI @ USAGI Project <yasuyuki.kozakai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:02:21 +0200
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:09:10PM +0900, Yasuyuki Kozakai wrote:
> > # Sometimes I confuse I should send patches to netdev, or send them to
> > # netfilter-devel and core team of netfilter review/send it to netdev.
>
> I don't know what Patrick told you, but I think as a general rule of
> thumb, all netfilter-related patches should go to netfilter-devel first.
> Patrick or I will then push them upstream to DaveM (most times with Cc
> to netdev).
>
> For urgent/critical bugfixes (that are not too complex), I am ok if
> netfilter-devel is bypassed and you submit it to netdev/davem
> immediately.
>
> Pragmatically speaking, Patrick or me will read your emails on either
> list - but a number of other netfilter developers is not following
> netdev, so you deprive them of the chance to give comments before it is
> submitted ;)
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> - Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.netfilter.org/
> ============================================================================
> "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
> architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
> on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
|