| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Please route new work through -mm tree? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:44:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <415B2B2B.5050904@pobox.com> |
| References: | <1096481023.8636.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <415AFB63.7010107@us.ibm.com> <20040929132247.227fffcd.davem@davemloft.net> <415B220F.4040102@us.ibm.com> <20040929142401.664d8fd7.davem@davemloft.net> <415B2B2B.5050904@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:37:47 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > > When I don't have any networking work present, that tree is > > simply deleted. So if you pull and get a URL error, that just > > means no changes pending and Linus has everything. :-) > > No need to delete it. When Linus merges your stuff, net-2.6 tree > becomes equivalent to linux-2.6 tree. > > When you next create and push local changes, a few days later, it is > guaranteed that there will be no conflicts between your local and > bkbits.net trees. Ok, works for me. I'll try to do this from now on. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, John Heffner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Please route new work through -mm tree?, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |