| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:17:31 -0700 |
| Cc: | jheffner@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040929225635.061f2405.ak@suse.de> |
| References: | <20040928223344.GC2975@wotan.suse.de> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0409282323220.27103-100000@dexter.psc.edu> <20040929090103.GB18671@wotan.suse.de> <20040929125644.40358b42.davem@davemloft.net> <20040929225635.061f2405.ak@suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:56:35 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Also the test that John wanted to diable has been in Linux practically > forever (irc dates back to Eric Schenk's work in 2.0) Yes, but it could prove something about either the sender or the receiver, namely that the receive window is not openning up fast enough for some reason, thus delaying the ACKs. > Part of the trace. It looks like the new kernel has really > bad problems with acking. It looks, again, like the receiver's window is not openning up fast enough, which controls ACK response decisions, and that is what jheffner's patch is supposed to verify. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Nivedita Singhvi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Move fib_alias out of fib_hash.c, Steven Blake |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |