| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:18:38 -0700 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1096413009.27967.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <1093799632.1073.410.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1096413009.27967.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:10:09 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:13 -0400, jamal wrote: > > > > The requeue event is useful in finding out when a device is overloaded > > on the egress (bus or bandwidth). > > Atached patch introduces this. I would have used the overlimit bits > > but at the moment thats being used for different semantical reasons. > > I have not done extensive testing on it. > > > > Opinions welcome - If all is good, Dave please apply. > > Dave, what happened to this? I put the stuff into iproute2 but the > requeue stat never made it into 2.6. Is it a bad idea? Yes, API breaker. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC/PATCH capture qdisc requeue event in stats, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |