| To: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:38:30 -0700 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jheffner@xxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, andy.grover@xxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <415910D2.7010808@us.ibm.com> |
| References: | <20040923161141.4ea9be4c.davem@davemloft.net> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0409271416360.14606-100000@dexter.psc.edu> <20040927160411.22b44f48.davem@davemloft.net> <20040927233639.GA8333@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040927171356.6a59d039.davem@davemloft.net> <415910D2.7010808@us.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:20:50 -0700 Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David S. Miller wrote: > > > Bright minds think alike. :-) We have to keep all the other > > packet counts in sync as well. > > > > Andi, others, forget my previous hack patch to tcp_clean_rtx_queue() > > and give this more complete patch a try. > > > > I'm getting really good results here on my tg3<-->tg3 setup using > > this patch. > > Dave, were you seeing a significant number of retransmissions > and sacks in your tests? None. I am working on a local network through a gigabit switch. I will work on making sure cases involving loss work correctly, via the netem module, before I submit these fixes upstream to Linus. Likely I will complete this work today. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline; generic 802.11 stack, Vladimir Kondratiev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Pablo Neira |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |