| To: | chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>) |
| From: | Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:07:10 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> |
| References: | <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:29:19PM -0400, chas williams (contractor) wrote:
<snip>
> diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
> --- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> +++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c 2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
> DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
> break;
> }
> - schedule_timeout(HZ / 25);
> + msleep(4);
Somehow this got changed for msleep(40); to msleep(4); !! :) The patch I
sent on 15 September had msleep(40); in it, at least. If you could make
the change in your bk, that would be great!
-Nish
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm2 fn_hash_insert oops, Lukas Hejtmanek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: msleep changes, Nishanth Aravamudan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>), chas williams (contractor) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |