| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:06:30 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040921195752.015e3d1d.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409200806460.22679-100000@netcore.fi> <20040920.152012.114156249.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040921195752.015e3d1d.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20040921195752.015e3d1d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:57:52 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:20:12 +0900 (JST) > YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This behavior lives for years (AFAIK), > > and we haven't got so many reports > > because people usually bring loopback device first. > > > > I think the following message will help people, anyway. > > If ipv6 has a dependency upon this, why doesn't it just > bring the device up itself at this moment if necessary? Okay, I'll make a patch for this. --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PPP-over-L2TP kernel support, new patch for review, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.8.1 IPv6 Routing Problem, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |