| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:04:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040920231805.3f18479c.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <20040918203319.24004d6e.davem@davemloft.net> <1095645106.1048.190.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040919195351.0b3560e6.davem@davemloft.net> <1095686672.1049.301.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040920121123.70baf895.davem@davemloft.net> <20040921034212.GA28462@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040920231805.3f18479c.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:18:05PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:42:12 +1000 > Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:11:23PM +0000, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > > > I believe I was successful in preserving existing behavior, but > > > I wonder if it makes sense any longer. CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS > > > changes not one data structure. It does exactly: > > > > Yes CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS has out-lived its usefulness. It has > > always seemed half-hearted compared to CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK. > > Ok, then I'm gonna nuke it. Hmm, are you removing TOS support completely or just remove the CONFIG and always enable the code? [Somehow it looks to me like you and Herbert are miscommunicating ;-] I think you should remove the TOS support completely because it's obsolete with fwmark. And maybe remove it will allow some tuning later. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH + RFC] neighbour/ARP cache scalability, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH][2.4.28-pre3] 3c59x builtin NIC on Asus Pundit-R, Andreas Haumer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |