| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Advice needed on IP-over-InfiniBand driver |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 19 Sep 2004 19:34:15 -0700 |
| Cc: | roland@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1095628759.1049.22.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <52fz5esxx6.fsf@topspin.com> <20040919140133.60ea3fb3.davem@davemloft.net> <1095628759.1049.22.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 19 Sep 2004 17:19:19 -0400 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Probably just easier to have his own private tables holding reference to > neighbor entries instead of polluting the neighbor tables. > Listens to ARP events - on state transition to/from reachable state he > queries his remote manager. > Curious though if ARP still works even when that "path" thing hasnt been > resolved. It sounds like a two-stage thing, the first stage lets you talk on the subnet and get to the IB subnet manager, and the second stage lets you acually speak IP. My understanding, from his description, is that once the second stage part is complete you don't need to first stage address information at all. The reason I suggested the scheme the way that I did was so that the hh_cache can work fully for IP over IB. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Clean up fib_hash datastructures, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Advice needed on IP-over-InfiniBand driver, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Advice needed on IP-over-InfiniBand driver, Roland Dreier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |