Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets

[Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:58:52PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> Besides, for any netlink socket but the first for a process, they'll
> all have negative pid's which have nothing to do with the real pid.
> So I really think that the wake_up_process hunk is bogus.

Another reason why this is bogus.

Most kernel users of unicast have a send timeout setting of 0.  Therefore
your wake_up_process() call will never happen when netlink_attachskb is
called by the kernel.
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt