| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [XFRM] Make XFRM core subsystem af-independent |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2004 09:16:11 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040917170607.2e96b58a.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20040917153536.6acec52e.davem@davemloft.net> <20040918.085003.77842779.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20040917170607.2e96b58a.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20040917170607.2e96b58a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:06:07 -0700), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > 2. David's one > > - maintenancability will be improved > > - maintains exported symbols for binary-only modules. > > - more function call and more stack usage. > > Compiler is smarter than you think :-) > > The whole stack frame is eliminated, because gcc > optimizes it away using tail-call optimizations. Okay, thank you for explanation. I'm not sure (and have some doubt) on i386, but I am now smarter than before. :-) --yoshfuji |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [XFRM] Make XFRM core subsystem af-independent, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TRIVIAL] Fix recent bug in fib_semantics.c, Jon Smirl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Make XFRM core subsystem af-independent, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Make XFRM core subsystem af-independent, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |