| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Convert RTM_* to enum |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:46:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040915044555.GA1323@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <20040915020942.GA32721@gondor.apana.org.au> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0409142337130.28280-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com> <20040915034748.GA952@gondor.apana.org.au> <20040914213837.75634b93.davem@davemloft.net> <20040915044555.GA1323@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:45:55 +1000 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 09:38:37PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > Right. If we start using defines we have to keep them around. > > I know it's bogus for people to ifdef this stuff, but we know > > they do, and it's in bad taste to knowingly break stuff like that. > > How about if we make it a rule that we only add new enum constants > but not macros? If you create some new enumeration from scratch, sure, but for existing ones no. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Convert RTM_* to enum, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: generic 802.11 stack, Vladimir Kondratiev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTNETLINK] Convert RTM_* to enum, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | [RTNETLINK] Tunnel config via netlink (Was Re: Convert RTM_* to enum), Ville Nuorvala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |