netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x net/sched/sch_api.c -- more comment reviews

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x net/sched/sch_api.c -- more comment reviews
From: S P <speattle@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040913153146.161128d0.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
> Please fix
> for future submissions, thanks.
will use attachments.

> 
> Now, onto the patch itself.  I think we're adding
> more tense
> errors than we're removing.  For example:
> 
> > -   All real intelligent work is done inside qdisc
> > modules.
> > +   All real intelligent work is done inside each
> > qdisc modules.
> 
> 'each' indicates singularity, yes "modules" is still
> plural.  I would change it instead to:
> 
>       All the real intelligent work is done inside
>       the qdisc modules.

I think I meant inside each of the module.  Not sure
if your change conveys that.  I did notice it's still
akward, but I didn't want to take away the emphasis of
individuality if the original author meant it.



> Looks fine, we're missing an articles here.
> So maybe the final version of this verse is:
> 
>       For complicated disciplines with multiple queues,
>       q->q is not a real packet queue whereas q->q.qlen
>       must be valid.
> 
> The rest looks fine.
Yup, I thought I lost that 'a' somewhere.  And, the
comma.  (so the code readers don't run out of breathe)
> 
> 
Thanks.
So should I resubmit w/ the changes?
Wasn't sure if you just applied w/ the changes or are
returning for me to apply the fixes.

:)


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>