| To: | S P <speattle@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x - include/net/neighbour.h spell-check |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:27:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040913174842.96183.qmail@web90003.mail.scd.yahoo.com> |
| References: | <20040913174842.96183.qmail@web90003.mail.scd.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:48:39 -0700 (PDT) S P <speattle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > in linux 2.6.x.x kernel's include/net/neighbour.h > 'Neighbour' and 'Neighbor' are used interchangeably. > > neighbour is british variation of neighbor, so i'd say > neighbor is more appropriate. but then the header's > named neighbour. Does anyone remember what happened on linux-kernel when the similar case of American English "color" vs. British English "colour" was being debated? In any event, whatever we decide we should do tree-wide. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] ip routing - split of ip_route_[in|out]put_slow, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Extend netlink error codes, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x - include/net/neighbour.h spell-check, S P |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] linux 2.6.x.x - include/net/neighbour.h spell-check, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |