netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: single process pppd for all PPP sessions? [Was [IPCOMP] Use per-cpu

To: "'Herbert Xu'" <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David S. Miller'" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: single process pppd for all PPP sessions? [Was [IPCOMP] Use per-cpu buffers]
From: "J Chapman" <jchapman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:18:39 +0100
Cc: <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-ppp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20040910111047.GA29330@gondor.apana.org.au>
Organization: Katalix Systems
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcSXJyCe9VjjxABuSBej5IYV8ee9zACRCR/g
Re: anyone think of doing a single process PPP daemon managing all 
PPP sessions?

Yes, although nothing started yet. Still working on OpenL2TP...
http://openl2tp.sf.net/

-James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 10 September 2004 12:11
> To: David S. Miller
> Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx;
linux-ppp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; paulus@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IPCOMP] Use per-cpu buffers
> 
[snip]

> On a totally orthogonal topic, has any body thought of doing a PPP
> daemon like the IPsec daemons? That is, have one process that manages
> all PPP sessions.  This could be useful for large L2TP servers and
> alike.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>