| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline; generic 802.11 stack |
| From: | Vladimir Kondratiev <vkondra@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:24:35 +0300 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx>, acx100-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4134C1A7.50600@pobox.com> |
| References: | <200408312111.02438.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <4134C1A7.50600@pobox.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7 |
Jeff, On Tuesday 31 August 2004 21:21, Jeff Garzik wrote: JG> Denis Vlasenko wrote: JG> > I think 'senior' network guys are in position to decide upon which JG> > of currently available 802.11 stacks we should continue to work. JG> > (Atheros has one, said to be derived from BSD, is there any others?) JG> JG> JG> Already have. Start with the code in wireless-2.6 -- HostAP -- and use JG> DaveM's 802.11 stack template as a model for actually integrating 802.11 JG> very tightly with the rest of the net stack. JG> JG> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/patchkits/2.6/davem-p8 0211.tar.bz2 Is this stack the main one that is going to be used? I.e. if I am working on driver for next generation .11 card - should I try to use it, request/submitt missing features etc.? Or should I use wireless extensions?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6]: Fix suboptimal fragment sizing for last fragment, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline; generic 802.11 stack, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6]: Fix suboptimal fragment sizing for last fragment, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] acx100 inclusion in mainline; generic 802.11 stack, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |