| To: | janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 1/8] irda/act200l-sir: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep() |
| From: | Jean Tourrilhes <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Sep 2004 14:09:29 -0700 |
| Address: | HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| E-mail: | jt@hpl.hp.com |
| In-reply-to: | <E1C2cIF-0007yy-Lb@sputnik> |
| Organisation: | HP Labs Palo Alto |
| References: | <E1C2cIF-0007yy-Lb@sputnik> |
| Reply-to: | jt@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:05:23PM +0200, janitor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I would appreciate any comments from the janitor@sternweltens list.
I already commented that I don't like the confusing msleep()
API and I prefer the more explicit schedule_timeout().
But that's only me...
Jean
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [patch 8/8] prism54/islpci_dev: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), janitor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 1/8] irda/act200l-sir: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), maximilian attems |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch 1/8] irda/act200l-sir: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), janitor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 1/8] irda/act200l-sir: replace schedule_timeout() with msleep(), maximilian attems |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |