netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] SLAB_PANIC cleanup

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLAB_PANIC cleanup
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:56:30 -0700
Cc: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040818042800.GC1007@conectiva.com.br>
References: <20040817100755.A20489@infradead.org> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0408170933240.9207-100000@dhcp83-76.boston.redhat.com> <20040817150739.A22153@infradead.org> <20040818042800.GC1007@conectiva.com.br>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:28:00 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Agreed, not because it is "not important", but because panicing at module
> load, even in very rare cases is unnacceptable IMHO.

I think even non-modular cases should fail gracefully.
If the ipv4 one fails, no ipv4 networking sorry. :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [XFRM] Kill unused flow_hash, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [IPSEC] Call xfrm6_rcv in xfrm6_tunnel_rcv, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] SLAB_PANIC cleanup, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Next by Thread:  [IPSEC] Call xfrm6_rcv in xfrm6_tunnel_rcv, Herbert Xu
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]