| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6 3/5]: Use double-linked list for dev->qdisc_list |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:43:08 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <410FAE42.2050909@trash.net> |
| References: | <410FAE42.2050909@trash.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 17:24:50 +0200
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch changes dev->qdisc_list to a double-linked list. This solves
> the performance problems when destroying qdiscs with large number of inner
> qdiscs.
I don't see how this bit is correct:
@@ -831,7 +832,7 @@
read_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
cb->args[0] = idx;
- cb->args[1] = q_idx;
+ cb->args[1] = q_idx - 1;
return skb->len;
}
The changes to the qdisc_list traversal loop above this hunk does not
change what the final q_idx value is going to be. The simplest
example is if the list is empty, for which q_idx will end up being
zero both before and after your changes.
Please enlighten me :)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Inaccuracies with SCH_CLK_CPU, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6 4/5]: remove unneccessary checks for qdisc->dev, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] cache align qdisc data, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6 3/5]: Use double-linked list for dev->qdisc_list, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |