| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC,PATCH] fastroute dead code... |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:45:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, tmattox@xxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040730131004.2be1274d.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <20040730060348.GA22854@havoc.gtf.org> <ea86ce220407301229522be64f@mail.gmail.com> <20040730193515.GA11365@havoc.gtf.org> <20040730131004.2be1274d.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 01:10:04PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:35:15 -0400 > Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It is dead code, as-is, in the kernel. It would require patches to > > actually work at all. > > > > It is impossible that fastrouting is being actively used, without patches. > > I totally agree. And people can always resurrect it from the > repository history or an old tarball if they wish. > > I think it should be killed entirely, and that's what I'm going > to do. The s390 people used to use it for local forwarding between partitions. I don't know if they still do however. -Andi > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.7 kernel boot-time configuration of a non-modular tulip driver, Bruce Janson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ksoftirqd uses 99% CPU triggered by network traffic (maybe RLT-8139 related), Pasi Sjoholm |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC,PATCH] fastroute dead code..., Kumar Gala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |