| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pskb change in dst->output |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:07:01 +1000 |
| Cc: | James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040709204228.GA3015@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <20040709081443.GA11101@gondor.apana.org.au> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0407091001460.3887-100000@thoron.boston.redhat.com> <20040709123608.1f9f9265.davem@redhat.com> <20040709204228.GA3015@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 06:42:28AM +1000, herbert wrote: > > So unless I've missed another case where someone will pass a clone > down, it is safe to change the checksum on the TCP clones. Please note that even if you decide at the API-level that it is not OK for dst->output() functions to modify anything beyond the IP headers, we still don't need to copy the entire skb. Since it's already a clone anyway, skb_cow() suffices to allow changing the checksum. Is there a situation where someone will pass a shared (not cloned) skb down on the netfilter path? If not, then we can do skb_cow() there as well. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x net driver updates, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: preliminary conclusions regarding window size issues, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pskb change in dst->output, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pskb change in dst->output, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |