| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: window tracking firewall involved, was: Re: preliminary conclusions regarding window size issues |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:37:08 -0700 |
| Cc: | jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ALESSANDRO.SUARDI@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040708063700.GA23496@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| References: | <20040707232757.GA14471@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20040708014443.GE17266@mail.shareable.org> <20040708060326.GA22258@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20040708063700.GA23496@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:37:00 +0200 bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 08:03:26AM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > > [ theory that a window tracking firewall drops packets for which it thinks > the intended recipient has no room, as they are larger than the window size > it sees, where it neglects to scale that window size ] > > > We could verify this assumption by checking if lowering the MTU to say 700 > > allows wscale=3 to work. > > This has now been confirmed with the packages.gentoo.org firewall! It's the netfilter patches added to the gentoo WOLK kernel running on packages.gentoo.org Specifically, it's the tcp-window-tracking patch from netfilter's patch-o-matic. There's some bug in there wrt. it's window scaling support. I bet if the tcp-window-scaling diff is removed from the kernel running there, the problem will totally go away. I note that it is using a very old version of the tcp-window-tracking patch, the current version is 2.2 and probably fixes this bug. The gentoo linux-2.4.20-wolk-4.14 kernel is using version 1.7 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broadcom 4400 driver bm44, Pekka Pietikainen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: asymmetry with MSG_DONTWAIT in sendmsg() and recvmsg(), Chris Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | window tracking firewall involved, was: Re: preliminary conclusions regarding window size issues, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: window tracking firewall involved, was: Re: preliminary conclusions regarding window size issues, Martin Josefsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |