| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:22:16 -0700 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1089234699.1026.448.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <20040701113312.43cfe6c5@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <20040702134437.5891e998@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <1088824432.1043.271.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040707111055.32ebb25b@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <1089226667.1027.411.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040707135831.4c98dd51@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> <1089234699.1026.448.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 07 Jul 2004 17:11:39 -0400 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 16:58, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > TBF works but since the sender (on the same local machine) may go over > > it's allocation, it will drop packets. > > As should any queue that gets congested. > > For example, if I use tbf to simulate a slow 33k bits/sec link then > > TCP test never > > completes, it just hangs! TBF does work for intermediate sizes. > > > > But if I use the pacing simulation it works. > > I am not sure i follow; is this because of the return code from the > enqueue? Actually, the problem only occurs if burst is set large (like 2mb). I think it gets stuck waiting for that much data. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] net: cleanup miss usage of seq_release_private, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: analysis of TCP window size issues still around - several reports / SACK involved?, Alessandro Suardi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] update to network emulation QOS scheduler, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |