netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.6] ip6t_LOG and packets with hop-by-hop options

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] ip6t_LOG and packets with hop-by-hop options
From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:01:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <20040706150918.GA5009@penguin.localdomain>
Mail-followup-to: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20040706150918.GA5009@penguin.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:09:18PM +0200, Marcel Sebek wrote:
> Packet with IPPROTO_HOPOPTS extended header isn't logged properly by
> ip6t_LOG.c. It only prints PROTO=0 and nothing more, because
> IPPROTO_HOPOPTS=0 and in this file 0 is used to indicate last header.
> This patch fix it by using IPPROTO_NONE to indicate last header.

looks fine to me.  Dave, can you please include this to your tree?
Thanks.
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>             http://www.netfilter.org/
============================================================================
  "Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
   architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
   on while IP was being designed."                    -- Paul Vixie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>